Project: Grady
Summary:
The Highway 65 bypass in Grady, Arkansas provides an alternative route to traffic that normally travels through the city. The bypass starts on US 65 near Choctaw Bayou, passes NE of Grady, and rejoins US 65 to the SE. The construction of a 3.9-mile bypass started in 2005 and was completed in 2009 with a cost of $22 million (in 2013$). The motivation behind the construction was to alleviate traffic conditions on the existing route.
Characteristics and Setting:
- Classification/Type
- Bypass
- Transportation Mode
- None
- Average Annual Daily Traffic
- 6
- Length (mi)
- 5.00
- Economic Distress
- 1.50
- Population Density (ppl/sq mi)
- 235
- Population Growth Rate (%)
- 0.00
- Employment Growth Rate (%)
- 0.00
- Market Size
- 456
- Airport Travel Distance (mi)
- 23.0000
- Topography
- 5
Geography
- Region
- Southeast
- State
- AR
- County
- Lincoln
- City
- Grady
- Urban/Class Level
- Metro
- Local Area
- N/A
- Impact Area
- Local Area
- Transportation System
- None
Timing
- Initial Study Date
- 1990
- Post Construction Study Date
- 2000
- Construction Start Date
- 1992
- Construction End Date
- 1996
- Months Duration
- N/A
Costs
- Project Year of Expenditure (YOE)
- 1990
- Planned Cost (YOE $)
- N/A
- Actual Cost (YOE $)
- 45,645
- Actual Cost (current $)
- 4,564
Pre/Post Conditions:
NOTE: All pre/post dollar values are in 2013$
Select a region to display the conditions for that region:
Local
| Measure | Pre project | Post project | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal Income Per Capita | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Economic Distress | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Number of Jobs | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Business Sales (in $M's) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Tax Revenue (in $M's) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Population | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Property Value (median house value) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Density (ppl/sq mi) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
County(ies)
| Measure | Pre project | Post project | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal Income Per Capita | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Economic Distress | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Number of Jobs | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Business Sales (in $M's) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Tax Revenue (in $M's) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Population | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Property Value (median house value) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Density (ppl/sq mi) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
State
| Measure | Pre project | Post project | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal Income Per Capita | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Economic Distress | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Number of Jobs | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Business Sales (in $M's) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Tax Revenue (in $M's) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Population | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Property Value (median house value) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
| Density (ppl/sq mi) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1% |
Local Area Impacts
NOTE: All impact dollar values are in 2013$
| Measure | Direct | Indirect | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jobs | 5.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 |
| Income (in $M's) | 5.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 |
| Output (in $M's) | 5.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 |
Case Location:
Narrative:
Grady
1.0 Synopsis
2.0 Background
2.1 Location & Transportation Connections
2.2 Community Character & Project Context
3.0 Project Description & Motives
4.0 Project Impacts
4.1 Transportation Impacts
4.2 Demographic, Economic & Land Use Impacts
5.0 Non-Transportation Factors
6.0 Resources
6.1 Citations
6.2 Interviews
Footnotes
Attachments:
No attachments were submitted.
